On 2014-05-15 08:36, Ben Boeckel wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:45:27 +0200, Nicolas Desprès wrote: >> Nope. These variables are the cmake equivalent to the __LINE__ and __FILE__ >> C-pre-processor macro. What I need is the #line directive equivalent which >> force the value of these variables so that error messages reported by cmake >> uses the forced value. > > If you'd like to try a patch, the relevant code is in > Source/cmExprParser*. Add a callback for #line nnn and update the > CurrentLine variable cmExprParserHelper.cxx. Don't forget tests :) . > > This will also likely need a policy since there's no guarantee that > #line "directives" don't exist in already existing code as comments.
Maybe we should not introduce pragma-like constructs that are indistinguishable from comments? :-) TBH I'd be a little ambivalent about such a feature. A line pragma itself isn't too bad, but opening the door for other types of pragmas makes me a little more nervous :-). -- Matthew -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
