On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Matthew Woehlke < mw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> On 2014-05-21 15:24, Nicolas Desprès wrote: > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > >> On 2014-05-15 08:36, Ben Boeckel wrote: > >>> This will also likely need a policy since there's no guarantee that > >>> #line "directives" don't exist in already existing code as comments. > >> > >> Maybe we should not introduce pragma-like constructs that are > >> indistinguishable from comments? :-) > >> > >> TBH I'd be a little ambivalent about such a feature. A line pragma > >> itself isn't too bad, but opening the door for other types of pragmas > >> makes me a little more nervous :-). > > > > If it is possible I would rather prefer a cmake macro too. > > I don't see why not... in fact it may be easier, since you won't have to > fiddle with the parsing at all. > Maybe because at the time the AST node is created the file location is frozen. Locations are controlled by the lexer so do comments. I am not exactly sure because I have not written a parser since a while. CMake's folk would confirm or not. -- Nicolas Desprès
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
