Brad King wrote: > On 10/27/2015 02:55 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: >> I wanted to stick my pin in the map on this as the person >> who wrote the feature :). > > As the person that wrote this feature I expect you to maintain it, please.
My idea of maintaining the feature included not adding conditionals for versions of Qt replaced years ago by newer Qt minor releases. Years ago people used the qt5_add_resources macro, and as far as I'm willing/able to put time into, a programmer writing new code in 2015 based on Qt 5.1 can do that too. This seems to be where you want things to be different, but I'm not going to test Qt 5.1 or do new work for supporting it :). I'm also not going to add new automoc support for Qt 3, even though that is equally as supported (by upstream and by cmake) as Qt 5.1 is. I think we understand each other, but we don't agree with each other. So, maybe that's the right point to drop this discussion thread :). Thanks, Steve. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
