Hello, 2008/9/19 Clemens Arth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [...] > > > I completely agree with you about the issue of adding and removing > individual files within a single solution, and I think the entire hack is > not a good solution. I would also prefer using an individual cross compile > configuration for each SDK.
Or we let the user set n-different toolchain files each identifying an individual SDK (or maybe no toolchain files, just SDKs), and execute the CMakelists multiple times using separate CMakeCaches. > Concerning Visual Studio projects, the main > problem is that one would wish to have a generator for any combination of > Visual Studio and any SDK, which simply does not exist. A possible solution > might be to e.g. use a somewhat generic "Visual Studio 9 2008 - SDK" > generator, which might get configured in more detail by sticking back to a > dedicated cross compile configuration based on a SDK to be selected in > advance (also by setting some flag). First I was thinking about implementing > it like that, integrating something like a dialog box or an additional flag > to specify a single SDK (or a set of SDKs) to be used during project > generation. Finally I did not do it because I did not find a nice solution > to the problem of interacting with cmake to specify SDKs - maybe one might > think about some mechanism to "generate generators" at cmake startup based > on the number of SDKs installed. What was the problem with the cmake user interface? kind regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
