On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Eric Noulard <[email protected]>wrote:
> 2009/2/16 Bill Hoffman <[email protected]>: > > Philip Lowman wrote: > >> > >> A tertiary goal would be convincing the 3rd party dependencies to switch > >> to CMake for their native build systems. > > I don't really like the "propaganda" idea :-) > > Particularly for Open Source projects. > > Open Source is about choice and openess. > > I don't want to contribute to a voluntary CMake conversion. > However I'll be glad (as usual) to help anyone requesting for help with > CMake. I assure you, should they not submit to mandatory CMake conversion of their trunks, it will be death by a thousand patches! =) Just kidding obviously. Like I said, I think it's a tertiary goal. =) We'll probably send some friendly emails telling them what we did in the hopes that someone is interested in merging the work or at least using it as a baseline for something better. I think every new release of MSVC pretty much makes CMake adoption more and more likely. Their conversion to the dark side is nearly complete. muahahaha. =) -- Philip Lowman
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
