Bah, this whole mailinglist disappeared to some file that I wasn't aware of :p But I found it back now... I moved the sources to a slow (7200 rpm) HDD using ext4, and it became 5 times faster. Conclusion: NTFS sucks totally.
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:47:36AM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote: > On 9/6/2012 5:56 AM, Amine Chadly wrote: > >Hi, > >I am no CMake expert, but I would test on an identical file system types... > >I am pretty sure that ntfs and ext3fs don't have the same read-write > >access latency and this might explain your time difference. > >You could additionally launch a strace on the two settings and see if > >there are major differences that could explain the performance hit... > >Good luck. > > > and has a NTFS. > > It is almost certainly the NTFS. What if you move the source to the SSD? > > -Bill -- Carlo Wood <ca...@alinoe.com> -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
