Thought it might be interesting to throw some other numbers at this. Everything is running on OS X 10.6.8 32GB RAM/SSD Boot Volume:
7200RPM Drive using Paragon Systems NTFS Version 10 43.4 secs NTFS 7200RPM Drive using Native OS X HFS+ drivers. 12.6 secs HFS+ Both of the above are on the physically same hard drive, but 2 different partitions. 10.4 secs HFS+ SSD (OWC 3G Mercury - 2010 Vintage) 9.9 secs HFS+ SSD (Corsair Force 3 - 2012 Vintage) Both the above were HFS+ Journaled on a 3G connection (although the Corsair is 6G capable) The times were to configure one of my projects (dream3D.bluequartz.net) Paragon says they are the fastest NTFS on OS X implementation. Just adding some points to the conversation. -- Mike Jackson <www.bluequartz.net> On Sep 10, 2012, at 12:39 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: > On 9/10/2012 12:12 PM, Yuri Timenkov wrote: >> Or it's implementation on Linux... I doubt anybody had any problems with >> NTFS on Windows :) > > No, NTFS sucks on any OS. It is way slower with file stats and file access. > > -Bill > > -- > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
