-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/24/2014 12:31 PM, David Cole wrote: >> You sure? When I checked, this did not work. Also, the following >> gives me a syntax error:
> > I, for one, would fully support breaking backwards compatibility to > fix this, and be strict with variable and macro and function name > identifiers. > > It's just ridiculous to waste time trying to justify the existing > behavior. It's more confusing than useful, and ought to be > changed. + 1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlNaL6UACgkQEr8WrU8nPV1TuACeJR8lNfWL6vDUDwnKLpkguvSm /yAAnibx3MX9EbY0EQyfdjrqBnvN5cfq =HLhL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
