On 02/27/2017 03:54 PM, Ray Donnelly wrote: > This is why my PR asks the linker that the compiler will use for the > actual list of implicit link dirs. I'm sorry I've not had time to > write up a clear explanation yet.
IIUC your case is the opposite of that under discussion in the rest of this thread. You want to include a rpath that is not currently included. Jörg wants to exclude a rpath that is currently being incorrectly included. The detection you're proposing would not discover the lib32 entry that is causing Jörg's problem. As I requested in your MR [1] it will be more appropriate to discuss your rpath-inclusion use case in a separate issue. Thanks, -Brad [1] https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/merge_requests/207#note_189880 -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
