Don't forget the copy to the physician

Theresa Lang
Specialized Medical Services, Inc

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Joanne Stutesman
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Denial Notices - Maria?


I'm curious if anyone has yet made the change to the new SNFABN form #
CMS-10055?
I don't recall the process with the new manuals being online, should we
actually expect a separate notice of changes to the manual?  At least
sections 20, 30, 40 and 70 that I have reviewed all carry a revision
date of 10-1-03, would this be the date they were moved to the new
online version?

In section 70.1 I am reading that a SNFABN is to be issued is "when the
SNF, UR, QIO or Medicare contractor believes that Medicare will not pay
for, or continue to pay for extended care services that the SNF
furnishes and that a physician ordered on the basis of one of the
following statutory exclusions 1) Not reasonable and necessary..., 2)
Custodial Care."

Section 70.2.2.2 indicates that "...if Medicare is expected to deny
payment for an item or service which is a Medicare benefit because it
does not meet a technical benefit requirement... A SNFABN should not be
given".

70.2.2.2 would indicate to me that a SNFABN would not be necessary if
the resident did not have a qualifying stay, nor at the time they
exhausted their benefits (I think there may have been more within
section 70 to indicate this).  Would others agree?  Also, the "Proper
Denial Paragraphs" (70.4.5) do not include technical denial examples. 

I did see a lot of good details within this that either are new or I
just wasn't aware of previously such as mailing the original and a copy
to the beneficiary with the original returned to the facility and then a
copy of the completed form returned to the beneficiary (rational is
given for this process.

Feedback and other interpretations welcome!
Joanne


-----Original Message-----
From: Infante, Marie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Denial Notices


The term "sarasett notices" comes from the history of these denial
notices and demand letters.  They are the result of a lawsuit filed many
years ago (I believe in California) that resulted in a settlement
between the advocates and (at the time)HCFA....As part of the
settlement, HCFA agreed to develop a procedure to inform Medicare
beneficiaries about coverage determinations (coverage not eligibility)
at the time of admission and provide a procedure for the beneficiary to
challange the determination of non-coverage by requesting that a "demand
bill" be filed with the FI so that the FI would make a determination of
coverage or noncoverage rather than the SNF.  These notices predate the
ABNs used in other settings and for Part B benefits and in light of
recent developments, it appears that CMS is attempting to induce some
consistency into the system for all providers and for all items and
services.  CMS semms to have gotten ahead of itself again on
implementation instructions and they should issue some clarification so
providers know what to do.  

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Winona M. Phelps
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 6:14 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Denial Notices


Hello.  Here is the link to the Medicare Northwest web site:
http://medicare.regence.com/medicare_part_a/whats_new/index.html
Below is an excerpt from their site under "Billing non-covered charges":
(the first option on the list).  Scroll to page 4:

"There are three different types of such notices given in different
settings for specific types of care: 1. Notices of non coverage are
given to eligible inpatients receiving or previously eligible for
non-hospice services covered under Medicare Part A....but services no
longer meet coverage guidelines...Beneficiaries in these settings never
receive ABN's 2. ABN's and HHABN's....These forms are used for Part B
and hospice services ONLY" 3. Payment Liability Condition 3........."

In my opinion, this information supports the SNFs' continued use of the
Medicare Denial of Benefits letter (the one we have always used) for
Medicare "cut" purposes and not switching to the ABN 10055 form for that
purpose. 
But I do think that this new information about the 10055 form is
confusing. For now, we are sticking with the Denial of Benefits Notice
until definite direction to the contrary (clarification) is received
from the FI.

One term that I've never heard of (under the number one instruction)  is
"Sarasett notice".  Has anyone ever heard of this term? Thank you,
Winona Phelps

-----Original Message-----
From: Sue Junot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Denial Notices


so does the cms10055 (SNFABN)replace the DETERMINATION ON ADMISSION AND
THE 
DETERMINATION ON CONTINUED STAY FORMS
SUE



>From: "Corey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Denial Notices
>Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:27:44 -0500
>
>Denial Notices
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Joanne Stutesman
>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 1:24 PM
>   Subject: Denial Notices
>
>
>   Could someone point me to the resource for denial notices?
>   Specifically, can they be dated/issued on the last covered day, or 
>must
>they be issued prior to the LCD?
>   Also, I had previously asked about denial notices on admission when
the 
>resident has no technical eligibilty, is a denial notice required on 
>admission in that situation?
>
>   Thanks for any advice,
>   Joanne Stutesman
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Gift-shop online from the comfort of home at MSN Shopping!  No crowds,
free 
parking.  http://shopping.msn.com

/----------------------------------------------------------
The Case Mix Discussion Group is a free service of the
 American Association of Nurse Assessment Coordinators
      "Committed to the Assessment Professional"
Be sure to visit the AANAC website. Accurate answers to your
         questions posted to NAC News and FAQs.
    For more info visit us at http://www.aanac.org
-----------------------------------------------------------/
/----------------------------------------------------------
The Case Mix Discussion Group is a free service of the
 American Association of Nurse Assessment Coordinators
      "Committed to the Assessment Professional"
Be sure to visit the AANAC website. Accurate answers to your
         questions posted to NAC News and FAQs.
    For more info visit us at http://www.aanac.org
-----------------------------------------------------------/


STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments
to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s)
and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not
the intended recipient, please notify Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris,
Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. immediately at either (617) 542-6000 or at
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and destroy all copies of this message and any
attachments.
/----------------------------------------------------------
The Case Mix Discussion Group is a free service of the
 American Association of Nurse Assessment Coordinators
      "Committed to the Assessment Professional"
Be sure to visit the AANAC website. Accurate answers to your
         questions posted to NAC News and FAQs.
    For more info visit us at http://www.aanac.org
-----------------------------------------------------------/
/----------------------------------------------------------
The Case Mix Discussion Group is a free service of the
 American Association of Nurse Assessment Coordinators
      "Committed to the Assessment Professional"
Be sure to visit the AANAC website. Accurate answers to your
         questions posted to NAC News and FAQs.
    For more info visit us at http://www.aanac.org
-----------------------------------------------------------/


/----------------------------------------------------------
The Case Mix Discussion Group is a free service of the
 American Association of Nurse Assessment Coordinators
      "Committed to the Assessment Professional"
Be sure to visit the AANAC website. Accurate answers to your
         questions posted to NAC News and FAQs.
    For more info visit us at http://www.aanac.org
-----------------------------------------------------------/

Reply via email to