joshua -- apologies for the delay in this reply but i havent had much
time to stare at code lately. the behavior you encountered isnt a bug
but it also isnt much of a feature, its due to a 'floor' like search
of the mode's legal steps. i could change that behavior but that
would break existing behavior.
perhaps i could add a :nearest keyword that would look for the
nearest (rather than the lower) step (?) so you would write:
(note 67 :nearest mymod)
of course if its equidistant to a step above AND below then it still
might not return the one you want, so ill have to think about how
best to do this.
On Mar 23, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Joshua Parmenter wrote:
Hi all...
This doesn't seem like the expected behavior. Is this right? And if
it is, does anyone know a way to get the values I'm expecting?
(defvar mymode)
(setq mymode (new mode :degrees '(c df ef f gs a b c)))
(note 67 :through mymode); => F ??? shouldn't it be GS?
(note 67.5 :through mymode) ;=> AF ???
(keynum 67 :through mymode); => 65 ??? shouldn't it be 68?
(keynum 67.4 :through mymode) ;=> 65 !!!
(keynum 67.5 :through mymode) ;=> 68 !!!
Thanks for any help.
Josh
******************************************
Joshua Parmenter
University of Washington
Center for Digital Arts and Experimental Media
School of Music
Seattle, Washington 98195
http://www.realizedsound.net/josh/
http://www.dxarts.washington.edu
_______________________________________________
Cmdist mailing list
[email protected]
http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
