Heinrich Taube wrote: > it seems like one of the juce wizards has written a class for > connecting to jack rather than alsa. its on page two of this (long) > discussion about audio problems on linux, which actually seem quite > centered on problems with alsa! > > http://www.rawmaterialsoftware.com/juceforum/viewtopic.php?t=1338 > > i dont really know what the right solution is to get the audio > problems sorted out on linux. >
Interesting discussion. The players include the developer of the excellent JOST plugin host (kraken, aka Lucio Asnaghi), the developer of Snd-ls and a JUCE-ified Mammut (kjetil, aka Kjetil Matheussen), and of course the lead JUCE dev (jules). Yes, the real focus of their lament is ALSA. Frankly, I agree with Kjetil: Use JACK for serious audio, use OSS (or ALSA's OSS emulation) for everything else. The number of audio "solutions" for Linux has become a problem itself, and application developers might be best advised to simply support OSS and JACK. IMO, you could skip OSS entirely too, but that's a little more radical. However, choosing JACK also gives you access to JackMIDI (better timing than the ALSA sequencer) and jackdmp (multiprocessor JACK daemon, aka JACK2). For my purposes there's little or no need for OSS support. I suggest going with JACK all the way. It's the best high-performance audio server available for Linux (and now OSX and reportedly Windows), it includes integral MIDI support, and its continued development is pretty likely. Now if only the JavaSound devs were listening ... Best, dp _______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
