On May 26, 2012, at 5:02 AM, Michael Edwards wrote: > I remain > sceptical myself however--I just find programming directly, in a text > editor, to be the most effective and efficient way of working. I > realise that I'm in the minority there though.
a minority for sure, but this is not a bad thing. actually, i was at mcgill last year; i showed stuff in sal (text), every other presentation was open music or pwgl. but some in the audience were neither, when i 'apologized' for showing the algorithms in text several opined that it was much easier to comprehend than the gui patches! > Having worked on SC in CLOS > since 2000 it wouldn't be a simple thing to port it. I haven't looked > into CLOS->Scheme in any detail but when I did a while ago it didn't > seem trivial. Rick did it though (and Bill too from Common Lisp at > least, I assu bill has tinyclos running in s7; its on my todo list this summer to see if i can't just boot the cm2 api in cm3/s7 using that. it should be possible since the cm2 CLOS code was actually auto-generated from cm2 scheme sources that used the "native" object systems in gauche, stklos, chicken scheme, all of which came from tinyclos.
_______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
