Not disqualifying anything else in cm, but having cm/scm/patterns.scm in snd would be a great start.
Running through patterns.scm now, it seems the main thing stopping it is a void 'define-record. Replacing these with calls on define-record-type (srfi-17?) from snd/r7rs.scm makes it load and the test-patterns output expected results. Q: would it break things in CM if define-record got replaced with define-record-type in pattern.scm? To use it stand-alone, ie. in a running snd, it needs some things from cm/scm/s7.scm + utilities.scm. I guess for now its ok to just 'inline' these dependencies, and aiming at a patterns.scm which to include with snd only. -anders _______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
