On 06/11/2015 06:09 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Not disqualifying anything else in cm, but having cm/scm/patterns.scm in > snd would be a great start.
Indeed, same here... I have used a modified patterns.scm but I think when I tried to do some stuff it was broken - I think embedded patterns did not do the right thing (and I did not have time to debug or follow up). > Running through patterns.scm now, it seems the main thing stopping it is > a void 'define-record. Replacing these with calls on define-record-type > (srfi-17?) from snd/r7rs.scm makes it load and the test-patterns output > expected results. > > Q: would it break things in CM if define-record got replaced with > define-record-type in pattern.scm? > > To use it stand-alone, ie. in a running snd, it needs some things from > cm/scm/s7.scm + utilities.scm. I guess for now its ok to just 'inline' > these dependencies, and aiming at a patterns.scm which to include with > snd only. Patterns and loop, I use them both and I'd love to see them supported in s7... -- Fernando _______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
