Hi Juan,

 if you need help, I can offer to test on linux, although Ralf Mattes
would obviously be a better choice than me.

For quite some time I have been very interested in getting all these
great tools quicklisp-loadable and make them cooperate in a more
up-to-date environment.

--
Orm

Am Dienstag, den 13. Dezember 2016 um 20:40:06 Uhr (-0600) schrieb
Juan Cristobal Cerrillo:
> 
> > On Dec 10, 2016, at 7:22 AM, b...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote:
> > 
> > ok -- that's fine by me, but I am no longer interested
> > in the CL part of that package.  I haven't worked on it
> > in about 20 years, and no longer have the time or
> > energy to provide support -- users of it are on their own.
> > Good luck.
> > 
> 
> Thank you for your reply Bill.
> 
> ¿Is anyone else is interested in collaborating on achieving a quicklisp 
> loadable cl-clm?
> All that is required is separating the different parts of all.lisp so that it 
> is loadable with asdf:load-system.
> I’ve managed to test my “port” successfully in ccl, sbcl and lispworks on osx.
> (though I would gladly accept any suggestions/advice that would make it 
> clearer/better)
> 
> Once this is achieved, the changes could be easily incorporated into the 
> official distribution (and then available through quicklisp).
> 
> I think it would be wonderful if clm was installable through quicklisp, not 
> least for historical reasons!
> 
> all best,
> 
> jc
> _______________________________________________
> Cmdist mailing list
> Cmdist@ccrma.stanford.edu
> https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist

_______________________________________________
Cmdist mailing list
Cmdist@ccrma.stanford.edu
https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist

Reply via email to