On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:40:06PM -0600, Juan Cristobal Cerrillo wrote:
> 
> > On Dec 10, 2016, at 7:22 AM, b...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote:
> > 
> > ok -- that's fine by me, but I am no longer interested
> > in the CL part of that package.  I haven't worked on it
> > in about 20 years, and no longer have the time or
> > energy to provide support -- users of it are on their own.
> > Good luck.
> > 
> 
> Thank you for your reply Bill.
> 
> ¿Is anyone else is interested in collaborating on achieving a quicklisp 
> loadable cl-clm?
> All that is required is separating the different parts of all.lisp so that it 
> is loadable with asdf:load-system.
> I???ve managed to test my ???port??? successfully in ccl, sbcl and lispworks 
> on osx.
> (though I would gladly accept any suggestions/advice that would make it 
> clearer/better)
> 
> Once this is achieved, the changes could be easily incorporated into the 
> official distribution (and then available through quicklisp).
> 
> I think it would be wonderful if clm was installable through quicklisp, not 
> least for historical reasons!

If a minimalist approach is good for you, it is quicklispable :)

(asdf:defsystem "clm"
  :description "Common Lisp Music"
  :version "3"
  :author "William Schottstaedt <bil (at) ccmra (dot) stanford (dot) edu>"
  :licence "LLGPL"
  :perform (compile-op (o c)
             (load (system-relative-pathname "clm" "all.lisp"))))
_______________________________________________
Cmdist mailing list
Cmdist@ccrma.stanford.edu
https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist

Reply via email to