|
@ Rick:
Thank you very much for your response. So it was mostly a technical reason to switch from CL to Scheme, not because of the language. It's also amazing to learn, that you even ported the system to Python.
Since you therefore have experience in algorithmic composition in at least four languages - Common Lisp, Scheme, SAL and Python - the question arises which of these languages you consider most useful to represent compositions and musical information.
I'm also curious whether you think object-orientation brings added value to algorithmic composition. In your papers and book you emphasized CLOS; in the Scheme version of Common Music object-orientation doesn't seem to be of importance, and - as far as I understood - SAL doesn't support object-orientation at all. Am I right to conclude from this that algorithmic composition has little benefit from object-orientation?
Thanks
R.K. | |
_______________________________________________
Cmdist mailing list
[email protected]
https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
