> Where is the content/presentation separation in my post? Which post?
> So basically > because of the computer cannot present easily in a way that allows the > reader to click on quotes and go directly to the post were it was > extracted from (Readers Usability). What? > Further more there is no way for > computer to distinguish different quotes according to user's and > referenced posts for example to beatify it according to that or for > example to simple access what was the post most referenced within a > given thread. I'm sorry, Nuno, but I have absolutely no idea what that sentence means. I *think* you are referring to some issues with email. Email is a defined content type. It pretty much is only displayed in an email client of some sort. The structure is very loose. What structure a person may want is typically handled by the application itself, inserting names when quoting, grouping email threads, etc... Again, though, when using email as an example, we're talking about a specific bit of content in a specific environment. The whole structured content argument is applicable where content is stored to be made readily available for repurposing and display in a variety of environs. Email is written with a very specific mind set of the author. An email is directed to a limited audience within the confines of an informal conversation. As such, it is seen as temporary, and of little interest for being repurposed as is in a different environment. The content simply isn't appropriate for complex structural markup, as it doesn't warrant it. -Darrel -- http://cms-list.org/ trim your replies for good karma.
