Rob -
A few clarifications. I think that when Tony indicated that he was
accessing the DB using ADO.NET, he needed some kind of direct
interaction that the API did not provide or he was accessing another DB
for other reasons. The broader point of his email was how you could
continue to use ASP in the .NET environment without using all of the
framework, and some of the pros and cons of doing so. 

That said, basic access through the API is still performed with ADO or
ADO.NET. When Tony converted, he kept a lot of his ASP, which meant he
was doing data access throught the COM API, which is using ADO. If he
had converted to ASP.NET, he would have been using the .NET API and the
data access would be accomplished using ADO.NET. Of course, this is all
under the hood, so the messy bits are hidden.

Now that I have put words in his mouth (hopefully, I got the point of
your email, Tony!!), maybe he can chime in and set the record straight.

As for the solution we build, we used the .NET API exclusively to
interact with the MCMS DB, so we did not need to ADO.NET directly. As I
noted earlier though, ADO.NET is being used under the hood. We were
accessing other DBs for a variety of reasons, and in those places, since
we were implementing a full .NET solution, we used ADO.NET.

Sincerely,
Bill Schneider
Director, Content Management
Ness Technologies
www.ness-usa.com
703-464-0133 x125
703-464-0138


-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Styles [mailto:mmmmmrob@;yahoo.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 4:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [cms-list] MSCMS 2002

Bill, Tony,

We have just implemented a serious degree of user
control using asp.net and MSCMS2002.  We have given
control over layout, look & feel of individual
controls, site hierarchy, textual content and more to
the business.  We have controls that generate images
dynamically based on business user settings, allowing
business users to manage text, layout, colour etc
within grahpics.  We have extended MSCMS2002 to allow
the business user to control the site hierarchy by
adding pages, rather than channels and postings, as
children or as siblings of any page.

My confusion is this... During all of this work at no
point did we have to go to the database directly.

If you are really using MSCMS2002 for managing the
content, why do you need ado or ado.net?

mmmmmRob

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
http://launch.yahoo.com/u2
--
http://cms-list.org/
trim your replies for good karma.
--
http://cms-list.org/
trim your replies for good karma.

Reply via email to