Andrew, I'd rather not get into the claim and counter claim thing. The great thing about the web is that trial versions are easy to get and prospective users can make up their own mind.
Warm regards, Marius Coomans -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cms-list-admin@;cms-list.org]On Behalf Of Andrew Roberts Sent: Friday, 15 November 2002 10:52 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [cms-list] Flash Editor (was MacroMedia Contribute) Ektron claims wrong, the Ephox JNI approach works flawlessly. We spent a _great_ deal of effort to make sure that it works exactly the same way on Mac as it does on Windows. Our API is just as powerful as any Windows-only solution and enables JavaScript macros, custom toolbar extensions, and more. In fact, because we use the native Mac OS X Aqua look-and-feel when running on Mac we often get comments that it is easier to use than any Windows solution :) I don't know about that but it certainly looks nice! Andrew Roberts www.ephox.com Marius Coomans: > Ektron claim that all of the work-arounds using Java to get fully featured > editors to work the same way on the Mac as on Windows have serious flaws. I > can't see any urgency from Apple and Microsoft to fix the underlying problems. -- http://cms-list.org/ trim your replies for good karma.
