I forgot to mention that the protocol it uses is FTP, so it will integrate
with any server platform (Linux/Apache is fine). It's really a client-side
product.

And I should have mentioned that although it meets your requirements quite
nicely now, if you have more ambitious CMS plans for the future you may
eventually outgrow the product.


-- 
Mark Thomas                       |_|
Internet Systems Architect        -+-
User Technology Associates, Inc.   |
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                  /-\


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas_M 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 9:07 AM
> To: 'Harcharan Singh'
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [cms-list] CMS Requirements
> 
> 
> Seems like you don't really need a "full" CMS, just an easy, 
> manageable way to have multiple authors editing pages.
> 
> For what you want I recommend Macromedia's new product, 
> Contribute. http://www.macromedia.com/software/contribute/
> The price is $99 per author.
> 
> Here's how it stacks up with your requirements.
> 
> >     1    Edit web pages online directly without going through the
> >         FTP-EDIT-FTP process
> 
> This is precisely what Contribute was designed for. To the 
> person editing the page, it's just open from server -> edit 
> -> save directly to server. They don't need to know HTML.
> 
> >     2    Add new links, new pages
> 
> The web developer creates "templates", which can be plain 
> HTML or DreamWeaver-style HTML templates which can specify 
> which _parts_ of the page are editable.
> 
> >     3    Do simple formatting ex.tables..complex formatting 
> >         (images etc.)
> >         not required)
> 
> The DreamWeaver editing engine is built into Contribute, so 
> you can do fairly complex editing. Tables and images are no problem.
> 
> >     4    Authentication..whether that individual/role can 
> > edit that section
> >         (marketing cannot change software etc.)
> 
> You can control which pages a person has access to, whether 
> they can create new pages, and with DreamWeaver templates, 
> even which part of each page they can edit.
> 
> >     5    Preferable (not necessary) to have version control 
> > with audit logs
> 
> Simple versioning with roll-back is available from 
> Contribute. I don't know what kind of logging there is.
> 
> >     6    Preferable (not necessary)..to be able to change 
> office docs 
> > (excel, word) directly
> 
> Content editors can drag and drop Office docs right into the 
> web pages. However, with Contribute you can only save HTML, 
> not the Office formats.
> 
> >     7    As easy to use as if working on a local file
> 
> Check. In fact, Macromedia is trying to make it as 
> mind-numbingly simple as possible for users/content editors. 
> The web developer creates a "connection key" which is a file 
> containing server connection information and user information 
> (for the access control). The user just has to double click 
> on the key to start Contribute and begin browsing the pages 
> they can edit.
> 
> So it seems that this relatively inexpensive product stacks 
> up rather nicely against your requirements.
> 
> -- 
> Mark Thomas                       |_|
> Internet Systems Architect        -+-
> User Technology Associates, Inc.   |
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]                  /-\
> 
> P.S. I found it interesting that Macromedia has a Contribute 
> development center with articles such as how to co-brand 
> Contribute... it looks like it is designed to be integrated 
> into CMS products.
> 
> 

--
http://cms-list.org/
trim your replies for good karma.

Reply via email to