If requirement #43 is fulfilled indeed (I wouldn't dare to doubt), it seems like a revolution. One objection my client always had against using Rexx in applications was the absence of record-layout definitions like in PL/I, Cobol, etc. The new Pipeline level ....
At the other hand I must admit that my mental capabilities are unable to exploit this without samples (i.e. purely based on PIPELINE NEWS). 2008/3/9, John Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > A number of enhancements, notably, a response to requirement #43. > > Happy plumbing, > > > j. > -- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support
