I'll second the plea for an example or two ... bc
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Kris Buelens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If requirement #43 is fulfilled indeed (I wouldn't dare to doubt), it > seems like a revolution. One objection my client always had against > using Rexx in applications was the absence of record-layout > definitions like in PL/I, Cobol, etc. The new Pipeline level .... > > At the other hand I must admit that my mental capabilities are unable > to exploit this without samples (i.e. purely based on PIPELINE NEWS). > > 2008/3/9, John Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > A number of enhancements, notably, a response to requirement #43. > > > > Happy plumbing, > > > > > > j. > > > > > > -- > Kris Buelens, > IBM Belgium, VM customer support >
