On 3/13/08, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Rod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > One based please. Oh please. Pretty please. Aw, go on... :-) > > > If this only were easy... You may be asking for the wrong thing. > One may be pretty once. But two offsets one make two. > > The point here is that you define a structure consisting of a few > fields. When the record contains exactly that structure, things are > obvious. But what if there is some fixed portion in front of it. > Suppose the structure starts at column 17 in the record. I would think > you specify that as > qualify xyz 17 member field1 ... member field2 .... > The 17 matches what you would have done with spec input ranges. > > But the way it now works is that you must specify 16 because there is > also an offset 1 from the structure itself. At least, as far as I > understand it. That's why the Piper and I disagree on this. Right now > I can correct this by starting my fields in the structure at 0 rather > than 1, unless he takes that away.
Sigh... I can see I'm going to have to logon and have a play. (Not now tho' - too late.) -- Rod
