But I don't want it in the reference, I want it in the details. The reference contains a table of known-valid Notes email addresses and their rfc822 equivalent and the details contains a table of Notes addresses I am trying to determine the rfc822 equivalent for. If I don't find a candidate address in the reference, I want to see if it has a "/Contr/" in it, remove it if so and re-look-it-up in the known-valid table.
What am I missing here? -- bc On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Schuh, Richard<[email protected]> wrote: > Feed them in to the tertiary input stream. > > > Tertiary Input Stream: When a record is read on the tertiary input stream, > the contents of the second input range are used as the key. The record is > added to the reference if there is not already a record in the reference for > the key. The record is also added if ALLMASTERS is specified. Otherwise the > record is a duplicate and it is passed to the quinary output stream (if it is > defined and connected). > > Regards, > Richard Schuh > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob Cronin >> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:19 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re-lookup? >> >> Is there a way to take detail records that were not found in >> the reference, modify them and then feed them back into the >> same lookup? >> >> For example let's say I am looking up an email address >> "Bob_Cronin/Contr/Poughkeepsie/IBM" and don't find it in the >> reference, can I >> on-the-fly-without-having-to-code-another-lookup take that >> non-matching record, modify it to "Bob_Cronin/Poughkeepsie/IBM" >> and look it up again? >> >> There seem to be lots of documented options for adding >> records to the reference on the fly, but not to the details. >> >> Am I just being silly here? >> -- >> bc >>
