On 8 January 2013 20:20, Mike Walter <[email protected]> wrote:
> "31:00" O'clock is not a valid time of day. It's interesting that the syntax diagrams added to the Endicott help files did not make it more clear. The wording from the book is: "When the first word has one or two numbers, the interpretation depends on the presence of a leading plus. [ snip ] When there is no leading plus (a time of day is specified), the leftmost number represents the hour; minutes and seconds are assumed to be zero when not specified." So in this case the hours is 31 and the minutes is 0, which could have been coded as "31" and similar to the example from the book. So "31" is 7am next day. I can't see why this would fail. Rob
