On Jan 8, 2013, at 14:03, Rob van der Heij wrote: > > So in this case the hours is 31 and the minutes is 0, which could have > been coded as "31" and similar to the example from the book. So "31" > is 7am next day. I can't see why this would fail. > As I said earlier, it seems to be affected by a storage shortage.
-- gil
