On 2016-01-26, at 23:18, Rob van der Heij wrote:
>
> Even if only you and the archive were having issues, that's enough reason
> to use another route for the mailing list. Hope I have enough interesting
> things to say in the future to justify that.
>
In the headers of your message, I see:
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
It's possible that some lazy and phobic mailer presumes from
the "iso-8859-1" that the message might contain non-ASCII
characters even though Q-P precludes that, and converts to
BASE64
What century is this? Why aren't all mailers by now 8-bit clean?
-- gil
