Oh, geez, of course. Sorry.  

-----Original Message-----
From: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 12:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: GLOBALV

The GET stores the value in a REXX variable, but there is nothing to pick it up 
and put it into the pipe.

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 at 18:00, Gentry, Steve < 
[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm not understanding something.
> Why does this work: GLOBALV SELECT SQL/DS LIST
>
> And this doesn't:  GLOBALV SELECT SQL/DS GET DBNAME      (DBNAME IS valid.)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List 
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Michael Harding
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 10:47 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: GLOBALV
>
> Or...
> 'PIPE command GLOBALV SELECT $$RDRLIS LIST | ... '  and locate or pick 
> the
> item(s) of interest.
>
> --
> Mike Harding
> /sp
>
>
> CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List <[email protected]> wrote 
> on
> 12/21/2017 07:31:37 AM:
>
> > From: Rob van der Heij <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: 12/21/2017 07:31 AM
> > Subject: Re: GLOBALV
> > Sent by: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List 
> > <[email protected]>
> >
> > Steve,
> >
> > Not really. CMS does not provide a native interface for CMS 
> > Pipelines to exploit.
> >
> > You can do things with "command" like this:
> >   'PIPE command GLOBALV SELECT $$RDRLIS STACK RDATETYP | append 
> > stack
> | ...'
> >
> > If you write a REXX filter, the value() function may be useful to do 
> > what you need.
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >
> > On 21 December 2017 at 16:24, Gentry, Steve < 
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi.  Is it possible to issue the GLOBALV   command from pipes?  Or is
> > > there a STAGE to retrieve the info?
> > > I've tried a number of combination of commands with no luck.  
> > > Those include  "| CMS GLOBALV . . . ." ,  "| CP GLOBALV . . . ." ,  
> > > "|
> COMMAND
> > > GLOBALV . . . . "  and a couple of things with SPEC.
> > > I could just read the file in a pipe and get what I want but 
> > > prefer not
> to.
> > > Thanks,
> > > Steve
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to