Good question Mark! I guess we start a "Resource Category" in WSG for systems that are capable of outputting standards compliant (or close) code, and just direct the questions to that list of resources.
I guess FarCry and Moveable Type are the first two contenders (along with Dreamweaver but definitely not FrontPage). I'll let you (anyone) use our WSG CMS to add the category and start adding the resources. What do you think, just a list of systems with the link directly to the site or some form of annotation or review? We can't not mention product names, that would be silly, but let's keep a kind of WSG attitude when blatantly promoting products. Probably a product description and a link to further information for these posts. If there's discussion (for or against) on a product, I think that's acceptable. I don't want to be a list-nazi on this one so please add your comments and let's form a loose set of rules. Regards, Peter > Hey Peter > > Can I just get one issue out of the way quick smart. A number > of people > that I expect to sign up on this list (including me), have some > affiliation to some commercial content management products. Maybe they > have built one & resell it, maybe they are distributors or > implementers > for a third party solution. > > Before the issues because an issue - what is the policy on promoting > products on this list? I think that if every new request for > information > about CMS's is inundated with "try mine, its the best" type > responses this > list will fail. Similarly preventing anyone from mentioning > any names as > they go about discussing CMS's the list is going to rapidly become > ridiculous. > > So where is the line? > > > Cheers > > Mark ********************************************************* The CMS discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *********************************************************
