Just by curiosity, has anyone among you used RedDot CMS?
Florence
"Johan Steenkamp"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.nz> To
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc
group.org
Subject
Re: [WSG CMS] General CMS consensus
10/12/2004 10:11
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
roup.org
Looks nice.
Would have expected to see valid XHTML for a new implementation, and
accessibility for a government site.
Regards
Johan
> ------------Original Message------------
> From: Mark Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, Dec-10-2004 11:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [WSG CMS] General CMS consensus
>
> I know what you mean - but a good CMS should not drive the user
> experience. Its a backend tool that produces HTML content.... in
> theory at least.
>
> We launched www.blacktown.nsw.gov.au last week. It uses the Shado & I
> think we found a good balance in getting the design we wanted without
> having to compromise because of limitations in the CMS.
>
> Shado is not perfect and it still doesn't allow me to access the
> <head> block (this is due to be fixed soon), but it does pretty damn
> good job of not getting in the road the rest of the time.
>
>
> --
> Mark Stanton
> Gruden Pty Ltd
> http://www.gruden.com
> *********************************************************
> The CMS discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> *********************************************************
>
>
>
*********************************************************
The CMS discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*********************************************************
**********************************************************************************************
If you do not wish to continue receiving email communications from
Perpetual Trustees Australia Limited (including its wholly owned
subsidiaries), please click here mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to send us an e-mail and we will update our records accordingly.
To assist us process your request, please include sender and subject
information from the above message in your e-mail.
PRIVILEGED - PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the
use of the addressee(s) and may contain information which is
confidential or privileged. If you receive this email and you are not
the addressee (or responsible for delivery of the email to the
addressee), please disregard the contents of the email, delete the
email and notify the author immediately.
**********************************************************************************************
*********************************************************
The CMS discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*********************************************************
