I have done movable type sites over 2,400 posts that rebuild in 3 minutes.
 I haven't heard of any cases recently that have size problems even a lot
larger except those that use MTIncludes rather than php includes. I go with
TWiki, see how large twiki.org is, the only reason it was a bit slow was the
server at sourceforge, not the program.

Bruce Prochnau
BKDesign Solutions

Drake, Ted C. wrote:
 I need to ask another question.
> We want to test on a local php box because it is easier to test on it than
> to go into our jsp/bea boxes.
> I'm looking at the jspwiki and it looks good.

> I've got a more global question that could be off-topic.
> I noticed on twiki that it is perl/cgi based.  Correct me if I'm wrong,
but
> didn't that lead to some of the initial troubles with Movable Type sits
that
> grew to larger sizes?  Should we avoid using perl/cgi? If given an option,
> would you choose a CMS that was jsp, php, or perl based?
>
> Thanks
> Ted
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Hassan Schroeder
> Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 7:39 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [WSG CMS] wiki suggestions
>
> Drake, Ted C. wrote:
>
> > We are looking into setting up an enterprise wiki and are leaning
towards
> > confluence.
>
>  > ............ We'd like it to work with our BEA Portal that is being
> > introduced.
> >
> > ... will use a simple apache/php/mysql platform.
>
> Those last two seem a bit contradictory, since BEA's portal runs on
> their Weblogic Java appserver :-)
>
> You might try JSPWiki <http://jspwiki.org/> which is very easy to
> customize...
>
> HTH!
> -- 
> Hassan Schroeder ----------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Webtuitive Design ===  (+1) 408-938-0567   === http://webtuitive.com
>
>                            dream.  code.
>
>
> *********************************************************
> The CMS discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> *********************************************************
> *********************************************************
> The CMS discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> *********************************************************
>
>

*********************************************************
The CMS discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*********************************************************

Reply via email to