there were a number of things which the experimental pcl did better than the then official release at the time i was porting, so i've been waiting for some indication that it had been folded into a stable release before rechecking compatibility and updating any documentation.
if anyone has built it with more recent cvs snapshots, please let me know, so that i can update the notes. otherwise i'll just keep watching the releases. Raymond Toy wrote: > > >>>>> "a" == a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > a> marked "yes[1]" under the "wo/CL-HTTP w/ name symbols" column. Footnote [1] > a> says "the experimental CLOS/MOP is required. tests were done with the > > Ah, ok. That's Gerd's PCL stuff. Yeah, it was experimental, but it's > not anymore. It will go out in the next release, and has been > the default for quite a while. > > Ray ...
