From: Arthur Lemmens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:12:56 +0100
Mikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Again, the big missing features seem to be Unicode support and > Win32 support. If "Win32 support" means "runs on Win32 systems", then I think CLisp has both Unicode and Win32 support. If "Win32 support" means "a usable interface to a reasonable subset of the Win32 API", my impression is that no open source Lisp has this. (But I've never used CLisp or SBCL or CMUCL, so please ignore me if I'm talking nonsense.) CMUCL and SBCL do not run on Windows at all, as far as I know. Could you detail which open source Lisp implementations you considered, and could you say specifically what you mean by "usable interface"?
