[EMAIL PROTECTED] (James A. Crippen) writes:
> function. How exactly am I supposed to make a closure over 'the > underlying state'? And how am I supposed to get at this 'underlying > state' without maintaining a reference to the object itself? I'm I didn't have time to read the whole mail but I got a feeling that this is something that you can do by making a closure over the result of (ALIEN:ALIEN-SAP your-alien-object). -- Hannu Please don't send copies of list mail
