Edi Weitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gerd Moellmann) writes: > > > On a second thought: If you're seeing type errors being detected, > > and assuming you are running the tests with the same OPTIMIZE > > settings, what you are seeing could be the type-check overhead. > > What would they look like? I use the same optimization settings and I > think I get the same compiler notes as before except for lots of > messages looking like
I meant the type errors you got from something being NIL and not a HASH, which you mentioned in another message. The type-checks themselves in PCL are done by wrapping stuff in (THE <slot-type> ...), which should be sensitive to OPTIMIZE settings.
