[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gerd Moellmann) writes: > I meant the type errors you got from something being NIL and not a > HASH, which you mentioned in another message. The type-checks > themselves in PCL are done by wrapping stuff in (THE <slot-type> > ...), which should be sensitive to OPTIMIZE settings.
I see. But that was only one and I have fixed it. As I said, I'll try to profile in the next days. Cheers, Edi.
