Hard to argue the first point. Things that are not attached have a propensity 
to dive off the boat the very moment you turn your head and often don’t even 
wait for that.

But re the second point, I have a handheld VHF radio (an older Icom) and its 
Lithium battery seems to last forever (usually most of the season, but I bring 
it home to recharge once every couple of months). And it has a 12 V cradle, as 
well, so you could charge it every time your on-board systems are on.

Marek

From: Frederick G Street via CnC-List 
Sent: Friday, January 8, 2016 12:38
To: [email protected] 
Cc: Frederick G Street 
Subject: Re: Stus-List VHF / AIS

That’s supposed to be a pretty nice radio; but I have an issue with the whole 
wireless remote mic thing. 

First, has anyone ever lost overboard something that wasn’t firmly attached to 
the boat?  And secondly, has anyone gone to use a piece of rechargeable 
battery-powered electronics, only to find that the battery was dead?  Neither 
of these scenarios apply to a hard-wired remote mic like the S-H or the Icom.

Otherwise, I’d agree that the Simard was a great option.


Fred Street -- Minneapolis
S/V Oceanis (1979 C&C Landfall 38) -- on the hard in Bayfield, WI   :^(

  On Jan 8, 2016, at 9:25 AM, Gary Russell via CnC-List <[email protected]> 
wrote:

  Has anyone looked at or used the Simrad RS35 VHF radio?  It looks amazing for 
the price!  It has NMEA2000, AIS, DSC and supports up to two wireless remote 
mikes.  Defender has it for $329.99.  The wireless remote mike is $139.99.  The 
comparable Icom radio is $399.99 and the remote mike and cable is $274.98.  So, 
$469.98 vs. $674.97. 

  Gary
  S/V High Maintenance
  '90 C&C 37+
  East Greenwich, RI, USA

  ~~~~~~~_/)~~~~~~



  On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Barry Lenoble via CnC-List 
<[email protected]> wrote:

    Hey,



    I do like Standard Horizon gear and I have had a few of their VHD radios. 
Nice gear, good audio quality, innovative, etc.



    My comment is this: The SH radios are NMEA 0183 only. This is too bad 
because NMEA 2000 is much easier to integrate. If you don’t have any other 
electronics, and don’t plan on integrating the radio to a plotter, then don’t 
worry about it and the SH radio is a good choice. However, if you think you 
might want to install a chartplotter, and display the AIS information on the 
plotter screen, and / or you plan on interfacing a plotter to an autopilot, 
wind instrument, or ANYTHING else, I strongly recommend you buy a VHF that has 
NMEA 2000 interface. 



    With NMEA 2000 you don’t have to worry about connecting the little tiny 
wires together, or about baud rates, or who is the talker and who is the 
listener. You just plug the cable in and it works. 



    Simrad makes a VHD/AIS receiver with NMEA 2000, so does Lowrance and I 
think icom does too



    The Simrad unit is nice because the second station handset is wireless and 
you can carry it with you. The Lowrance unit doesn’t support the second 
handset. 



    Good luck,

    Barry







    Barry Lenoble

    [email protected]

    Deep Blue C, C&C 110

    Mt. Sinai, NY
_______________________________________________

Email address:
[email protected]
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com

Reply via email to