Dennis,

Nice blocks.  We "jump" halyards up North.  And 30 years olds don't date
teenagers.  :)

Joel

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Dennis C. via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> Interesting.  Never thought one of those old 90 degree exit blocks would
> rip out but there's proof.
>
> Here's some more thoughts on re-configuring running rigging.
>
> While I did mention that as part of Touche' running rigging
> reconfiguration I'd removed the two 90 degree exit sheave blocks at the
> mast base, I didn't mention that I installed halyard exit plates well above
> deck level.  All the halyards exit high enough that the mast person can
> easily grab and "hump" the halyards.  (Not sure that hump is a local term
> or not.  Refers to the repetitive grab and hoist action for hoisting
> sails.)  I covered the holes for the old exit blocks with metal plates.
>
> When re-configuring the running rigging, I wanted to ensure that the loads
> were carried by the mast, not by the collar.  In some boats, the halyard
> turning load is transferred to the collar or to a deck mounted turning
> block.  In my opinion, that is not optimal.  Some boats have a short
> turnbuckle or such which connects the collar to the mast to prevent the
> collar (and deck) from lifting.
>
> After some research, I  found Garhauer had some nice hinged mast base
> turning blocks.  Guido even offered to countersink the bracket for flat
> head fasteners.  I think Garhauer was making these blocks for Catalina.
> They can be seen here:
>
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_sb5TfIENvsdTZpUEFRcjZ1SEE
>
> You can also see the top of the metal plate covering the exit block hole
> behind the black line (which is the pole topping lift).  The red line is
> Spin 1.  The aftmost white line is the main halyard.  The blue line on the
> forward part of the mast is the spin pole car sheet.
>
> Keep in mind that Touche' is rigged to race.  I had been racing as crew on
> many boats for nearly a decade so I'd seen a lot of racing rigs and knew
> how I wanted Touche' rigged.  Of course, converting an early 70's boat to
> approximate today's efficient racing rigs is a compromise.
>
> Although I was able to cross the port jib halyard to exit starboard, I
> haven't crossed the wing (spinnaker) halyards to the opposite sides.
> Touche's spinnaker halyards are external.  I think Touche's masthead is
> unusual.  Seems C&C (Klacko) used several different mastheads.  Touche's is
> a single ear projecting forward.  My buddy's Hull 61 has two ears or bails
> projecting at about 45 degrees.  Touche's original spinnaker setup had a
> shackle with two blocks.  It can be seen here:
>
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_sb5TfIENvsQ1R6SkRkTThKZEE
>
> One of the issues with that was the top of the furler extrusion extended
> upward between the two blocks.  When the furler spun, it whacked around
> between the blocks.  Not optimum.  I replaced the shackle with an eyebolt
> and eye nut to spread the distance between the blocks.  I also replaced the
> two old Schaefer blocks with Harkens.  See the new configuration here:
>
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_sb5TfIENvsMWFpLTdLaUpoVkE
>
> Crossing them externally is not a good option.  In order to cross them,
> I'd have to install exit sheaves just below the masthead in order to run
> the halyards inside the mast.
>
> For non-racers, the reason you want to cross halyards is to put the mast
> person on the high (windward) side of the boat as you approach and round
> race marks.  It is not only better for weight distribution, it is safer for
> the crewperson.  Hoisting a sail from the low side of the boat while the
> boat is heeled 15-20 degrees (and your butt is hanging over the lifeline)
> is intimidating.  We most frequently do port roundings (leave mark to port).
>
> Dennis C.
> Touche' 35-1 #83
> Mandeville, LA
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Matthew L. Wolford via CnC-List <
> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>
>> James:
>>
>>     If you’re looking for general feedback, I’ll add my two cents.  The
>> main halyard on my 42 was wire-to-rope and was led internally through an
>> exit box near the base of the mast.  In my case, a winch on the deck near
>> the mast was used for the main.  A few years ago we were heading out for a
>> race in about 20-25 knots of breeze, started to raise the main, and the
>> exit box ripped out of the mast.  Something about that 90 degree angle
>> results in a lot of force.  We made a semi-permanent repair that got us
>> through the season.  At the end of the season, I decided to do several
>> things: 1) instead of using the old configuration, I eliminated the exit
>> box and started using a mast-mounted winch that was already on the mast but
>> wasn’t being used for anything (which I found curious); 2) a short distance
>> above the winch, I installed a mast exit plate so the halyard would stay
>> internal; and 3) I replaced the wire-to-rope halyard with a low-stretch New
>> England rope.  I forget the name, but it was more high tech than Sta-Set.
>> I like the new configuration, although someone needs to raise the halyard
>> at the mast (which is no different than it was before but may be a drawback
>> for shorthanded sailors).  The only issue I have is that the high-tech line
>> is not as low-stretch as manufacturer claims, and I use the Cunningham more
>> than I care to as the wind picks up.  That said, the run from the winch to
>> the top of the mast is over 50 feet, so some stretch is to be expected.
>> When the current halyard is retired, I will replace it with something that
>> is really low stretch, and may possibly go back to wire-to-rope.
>>
>>     MLW
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
>
>


-- 
Joel
301 541 8551
_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

Reply via email to