Thanks, Josh.  I have no opinion one way or the other aside from what I’ve 
heard and read — which may be pure fiction.  Admittedly, it has been a while 
since I heard negative comments about Marelon.  Perhaps the concern was more 
about the uncertainty of change.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 5, 2019, at 10:34 PM, Josh Muckley via CnC-List 
> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
> 
> Well Matthew I wouldn't go so far as to say that your cautions are meritless. 
>  I just haven't had any trouble with mine.  I understand the aversion to 
> "plastic" - just doesn't seen strong enough.  Consider on the other hand how 
> narley some of the bronze fittings can look when left to their own devices.
> 
> Josh 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019, 9:56 PM Matthew L. Wolford via CnC-List 
>> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>> There you have it.  I guess the cautions I’ve heard and read about lack 
>> merit.
>>  
>> From: Josh Muckley via CnC-List
>> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2019 5:22 PM
>> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
>> Cc: Josh Muckley
>> Subject: Re: Stus-List Ye Olde Stuck Seacock issue
>>  
>> For what it is worth, my boat came with Marlon all around.  I've had 
>> absolutely no trouble at all and strongly recommend. 
>>  
>> Josh Muckley
>> S/V Sea Hawk
>> 1989 C&C 37+
>> Solomons, MD
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019, 5:15 PM Matthew L. Wolford via CnC-List 
>>> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>  wrote:
>>> FWIW, I’m not a big fan of marelon where there is a potential for breakage. 
>>>  I would be reluctant to use marelon seacocks for the cockpit scuppers on 
>>> my boat.  I can envision crawling around in that space (like    working on 
>>> the quadrant) and inadvertently breaking a seacock by pushing on it with my 
>>> foot for leverage (without knowing what I’m pushing on).
>>>  
>>> From: sender via CnC-List
>>> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2019 3:20 PM
>>> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
>>> Cc: sender
>>> Subject: Re: Stus-List Ye Olde Stuck Seacock issue
>>>  
>>> Thanks to all who responded.
>>>  
>>> I was hoping there would be an abundance of people in a similar situation, 
>>> successfully freeing up the seacocks without too much difficulty.  There 
>>> wasn't, so I think I'm going to go the route of replacing with Marelon 
>>> seacocks and hopefully be done with it for good.
>>>  
>>> The secondary discussion about the lines crossing, is interesting, but I've 
>>> never noticed any back-up of water through the existing arrangement.  It 
>>> seems to me for the crossed arrangement to work, the windward hull fitting 
>>> would have to be well above the healed waterline to avoid water ingress, 
>>> which means you would't get drainage of any spray when healed.  Am I 
>>> missing something here?
>>>  
>>> Thanks again,
>>> Eric
>>>  
>>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 7:18 AM Neil Andersen via CnC-List 
>>>> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>>>> But by crossing the hoses, you don’t end up wit a situation where the 
>>>> scupper and thru-hull are both below the waterline when healed.
>>>>  
>>>> Neil Andersen
>>>> 1982 C&C 32 FoxFire
>>>> Rock Hall, MD
>>>>  
>>>> Neil Andersen
>>>> 20691 Jamieson Rd
>>>> Rock Hall, MD 21661
>>>>  
>>>> From: CnC-List <cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com> on behalf of Matthew L. 
>>>> Wolford via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
>>>> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2018 10:08 AM
>>>> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
>>>> Cc: Matthew L. Wolford
>>>> Subject: Re: Stus-List Ye Olde Stuck Seacock issue
>>>>  
>>>> Agreed that cockpit drains should always be open and functioning 
>>>> correctly.  I had one closed for some repair work on my old Ranger 26 and 
>>>> decided it would be safe to race the boat with one functioning cockpit 
>>>> drain.  Worked great as long as we were on the right tack.  We were 
>>>> nervously bailing on the other tack several miles offshore.  Never again.
>>>>  
>>>> I am curious to hear more about the idea of crossing the hoses.  It does 
>>>> not make sense to me as the far side thru-hull would be higher when 
>>>> heeled.  
>>>>  
>>>> From: Josh Muckley via CnC-List
>>>> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2018 10:19 AM
>>>> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
>>>> Cc: Josh Muckley
>>>> Subject: Re: Stus-List Ye Olde Stuck Seacock issue
>>>>  
>>>> I apologize for creating confusion.  For the reasons stated by Andrew 
>>>> Burton, DO NOT shut cockpit drains.  Period.  My statement was supposed to 
>>>> be that having seacocks open while not in use, or while away from the the 
>>>> boat was an invitation for desaster.  A better practice would be to 
>>>> relocate the cockpit drains to a location above the waterline which would 
>>>> eliminate the need for isolation valves and the subsequent risk incurred 
>>>> by the necessity of leaving them open.  
>>>>  
>>>> I also went on to suggest that in order to keep them above water on all 
>>>> angles of heel that you MAY need to cross the drains port-stbd though 
>>>> depending on the discharge location this may cause the cockpit drains to 
>>>> be lower than the discharge ports and subsequently not drain until the 
>>>> next tack.  A more centralized drain is a better solution.  As mentioned 
>>>> by others a discharge in the transom is a good solution.  You want it as 
>>>> high above waterline as possible but below the cockpit floor.
>>>>  
>>>> Josh Muckley
>>>> S/V Sea Hawk
>>>> 1989 C&C 37+
>>>> Solomons, MD
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018, 10:03 AM PETER OCAMPO via CnC-List 
>>>>> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>>>>> Maybe dumb question but I have only been sailing on C&c  40 for 3 years. 
>>>>> (J24 Catalina oday all had open cockpit drains out stern)
>>>>>  
>>>>> When sailing do people regularly close cockpit drains  I am on the side 
>>>>> mine are always open but I did service mine which required them to be 
>>>>> taken apart(frozen open— lots of pb. Blaster and kroil oil and careful 
>>>>> persuasion) ). So if I wanted to I could close them  I could
>>>>>  
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>  
>>>>> Peter
>>>>> C&c 40 aft 1983
>>>>> Portland me
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Dec 30, 2018, at 9:19 AM, Andrew Burton via CnC-List 
>>>>>> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cockpit drain seacocks most assuredly should not be closed when no one 
>>>>>> is aboard...unless you plan to swim in your cockpit!
>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Andrew Burton
>>>>>> 139 Tuckerman Ave
>>>>>> Middletown, RI
>>>>>> USA    02842
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> http://sites.google.com/site/andrewburtonyachtservices/
>>>>>> +401 965-5260
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Dec 30, 2018, at 05:10, Josh Muckley via CnC-List 
>>>>>>> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That was poor engineering to begin with.  Seacocks should be closed 
>>>>>>> when not in use and more importantly when not on board - particularly 
>>>>>>> those below the water line.  There is no time when your cockpit drains 
>>>>>>> will not be in use.  Besides, seacocks that are inaccessible never get 
>>>>>>> closed.  I suggest looking for a place to re-route your drains, to a 
>>>>>>> location above the waterline, without valves, and then permanently 
>>>>>>> retire the through hulls.
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Also consider the waterline when heeled.  You may have to cross port 
>>>>>>> and starboard.
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Josh Muckley
>>>>>>> S/V Sea Hawk
>>>>>>> 1989 C&C 37+
>>>>>>> Solomons, MD 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018, 11:18 PM sender via CnC-List 
>>>>>>>> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I bought earlier this year a C&C 32.  One issue the surveyor pointed 
>>>>>>>> out is the seacocks for the cockpit drains are stuck in the open 
>>>>>>>> position.  This boat has spent              it's known history in cold 
>>>>>>>> salt water on the west coast of BC.
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> I'm interested to know if anyone else has had this same type of 
>>>>>>>> seacock, and had success freeing it up. 
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/xp1haN2nPHUneETUA
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> The starboard side one is only barely accessible through the 12"x 12" 
>>>>>>>> panel in the aft end of the quarter-birth.  If it was reasonably 
>>>>>>>> accessible, I'd just replace it, but to get 2 hands on it I'd probably 
>>>>>>>> have to go through the locker and remove the fuel tank.
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> The other pic is a fitting on the rudder tube.  I assume this is 
>>>>>>>> (well, was) a grease cup.  Has anyone taken one of these on?
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Eric
>>>>>>>> C&C 32 Sirocco 2
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  
>>>>>>>> Each and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to             
>>>>>>>>  support the list - use PayPal to send contribution --   
>>>>>>>> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each 
>>>>>>> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list 
>>>>>>> - use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each 
>>>>>> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - 
>>>>>> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each 
>>>>> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - 
>>>>> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each 
>>>> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - 
>>>> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each 
>>>> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - 
>>>> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 
>>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
>>> every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use 
>>> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 
>>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
>>> every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use 
>>> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
>> every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use 
>> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
>> every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use 
>> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
> every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use 
> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
> 
_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

Reply via email to