> I tried a second drive in bay two, but this doesn't appear as /dev/hdb
> with a simple fdisk listing. Is this a second IDE chain (so both drives
> should be considered solo on their chain), or is this the same IDE chain
> (requiring master/slave jumpers, which seems odd if the second bay was
> intended for software RAID)?
>
If you look in /var/log/dmesg you should find some lines like...
(This isnt from a RaQ so it wont look exactly like this but its the last too
lines that are important)
PIIX4: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev f9
PIIX4: chipset revision 2
PIIX4: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
ide0: BM-DMA at 0xffa0-0xffa7, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:DMA
ide1: BM-DMA at 0xffa8-0xffaf, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
hda: IC35L060AVER07-0, ATA DISK drive
hdb: IC35L060AVER07-0, ATA DISK drive
This are shown up as
hda - Primary IDE Master
hdb - Primary IDE Slave
hdc - Secondary IDE Master
hdd - Secondary IDE Slave
I think by your terminology "should be considered solo on their chain" you
might have the device setup as hdc and not hdb.
ChrisB.
--
http://ChrisBurton.info/
_______________________________________________
cobalt-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-developers
