> And the portsentry alternative to deal with 20+ scans per day is....? Good host-based IDS, updated patches, a hardened server, and a vigilant admin. > Are you suggesting that running without Portsentry is better than running with it? Yes. Kevin _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
- Re: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Michael Stauber
- SV: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Kai Schantz, Euroweb
- Re: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Kevin D
- RE: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Tony
- Re: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Michael Stauber
- RE: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Graeme Fowler
- RE: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Sean Chester
- RE: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Glen Scott
- SV: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Kai Schantz, Euroweb
- RE: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Sean Chester
- Re: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Kevin D
- Re: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Kevin D
- RE: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Tony
- SV: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Kai Schantz, Euroweb
- Re: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Brad Hubbard
- Re: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Michael Stauber
- RE: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Port Sentry Benoit Perreault
