Hi, We've got here some RAQ 4 and one RAQ 550 I've got two questions : 1- When we received Mail which are bad formated : with multiple "for" and "to" in the SMTP head the Raq 4 accept for delivery if the first "for" or "to" match to the Sites ( or virtual Sites ) and he queued the other "for" or "to" to re-send the mail ( with bad delivery ) ... Did you have a param or something else to kill the mail and not to queued them or where can I find in root the param to give to sendmail the time before deleting it. 2- Did you have heard about something like "reduncing system" (or technotes) between Raq4 and Raq 550 ( not in real time !!!) Cheers, Nicolas _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
- Re: [cobalt-security] (no subject) Fernando Segura
- Re: [cobalt-security] (no subject) Gerald Waugh
- [cobalt-security] (no subject) Rick
- Re: [cobalt-security] (no subject) Jaana J�rve
- RE: [cobalt-security] (no subject) Jamie - i-Dot
- Re: [cobalt-security] (no subject) Gerald Waugh
- RE: [cobalt-security] (no subject) Tony
- Re: [cobalt-security] (no subject) Tom Worley
- [cobalt-security] (no subject) Goade, Matthew
- RE: [cobalt-security] (no subject) Graeme Fowler
- RE: [cobalt-security] (no subject) nicolas
- RE: [cobalt-security] (no subject) Gavin Nelmes-Crocker
- Re: [cobalt-security] (no subject) Gerald Waugh
- Re: [cobalt-security] (no subject) Paul Jacobs
- Re: [cobalt-security] (no subject) Jeff Lasman
- RE: [cobalt-security] (no subj Terrance Dwyer
- RE: [cobalt-security] (no subject) Gavin Nelmes-Crocker
- RE: [cobalt-security] (no subject) Stephen Rice
- RE: [cobalt-security] Securing your RaQ (formerl... Gavin Nelmes-Crocker
- Re: [cobalt-security] Securing your RaQ (for... Greg Mosier
