Thom LaCosta wrote: > > However, the fact that Plesk 2.0 is a dead-end and that there's > > currently no plans to port more recent versions to RaQs, is an issue in > > my opinion; we're NOT pushing the product. > > Your business plan aside, it's very interesting that software developers > who make an effort ot be "players" in our industry decide to bypass the > RaQs. Certainly doesn't sound like a healthy stamp of approval to me.
Tom, I'm sorry I didn't make myself a bit more clear... when I wrote "we're NOT pushing the product" the product I was referring to was Plesk 2.0 for the Raq. We continue to support RaQs extensively; we're developing products for the 550 as well as for the 4. Like Sun, we're not developing for the 3, but we could if there were a market. True I don't go out and buy a lot of RaQs, but I don't buy Plesk-powered servers, either. My main business is supporting resellers. I'm going to soon take my RaQ (it's a 3 running 4 software) out of service, but only so I can do destructive testing on it. I'll move my few retail clients to a Plesk server already hosting shared wholesale accounts. It's true the RaQ doesn't offer shared wholesale solutions; it doesn't have a reseller control panel. But we still use them for dedicated reseller solutions, as we do Plesk. Jeff -- Jeff Lasman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux and Cobalt/Sun/RaQ Consulting nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 voice: +1 909 778-9980 * fax: +1 909 548-9484 _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
