> Good reading..... > http://www.internetwk.com/webDev/INW20021205S0005 > Cobalt boxes are run on AMD CPU'S right?
Gosh .. I didn't realise I'd subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Several points: 1) Oh golly, yes, sorry, I'm going to say it again. THIS HAS /NOTHING/ to do with security. If you're going to post, post on a relevant list. 2) Hyperthreading is far from proven to give a significant increase. Current benchmarks range from worse performance to + ~15% dependent upon the task in question. 3) Do you have any proof that the Intel compiler, $399, is any better than gcc, free, shipped with the RaQs? And please note that 'better' != makes smaller/faster code. 4) How is this relevant? You're right in that the RaQ we use has a K6. Why should I be interested in a technology that the box we've already bought doesn't support? Anyway, this is largely pointless as I know you're going to reply to this e-mail, quoting the whole thing, with a one-line reply ... which probably /still/ won't be relevant. *shakes head, gives up* Have a wonderful day, John P.S. Yes, I'm trying to be polite. Please stop posting off-topic stuff to the cobalt-security list on the assumption that we'll find it interesting*. *: Random sample: http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-security/2002-December/006932.html http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-security/2002-November/006707.html http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-security/2002-November/006747.html http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-security/2002-November/006774.html http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-security/2002-November/006819.html _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
