> >3) Do you have any proof that the Intel compiler, $399, is > any better > >than gcc, free, shipped with the RaQs? And please note that > 'better' > >!= makes smaller/faster code. > > Why does better have to be smaller?, faster yes I agree!.
He didn't say that better had to be smaller or faster. Try reading up a bit more on C++ compilers and you will see that != generally means 'not equal to'. If you don't get that right, the latest Intel compiler isn't going to help you too much. ;-) Although your post was probably of interest to some of the list, it really has nothing to do with cobalt security at all. ~ Steven Young _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
