Jon schrieb: >>>Maxtor 34098H4: seek=10,6W; idle=5,5W >>>Seagate ST340823A: seek=9,6W; idle=4,8W >>>IBM DTLA-305040: seek=8,6 W; idle=4,9W >>> >>> > >I am thinking of upgrading the diskes on the raq4r, initially with the IBM which were >7200rpm but now suspect that this could cause >uneccesary problems in the future. It looks like the seagate 5200rpm dirves are the >best option, is this right? > >Thanks > >Jon > > there is no definitv rule for that ... there are a lot people swear at the IBM and another lot who swear to the Seagate ... the only thing I could say is that the newer 7200rpm mostly consume more power than the 5200rpm drives ... if the IBM 7200rpm drive consumes less power than a Seaget with 5200rpm, you might choose the faster 7200rpm ... but all in all its playing with numbers ... there is NO guarantee at all ... But all in all the Seagate might be a good choice !
regards -- �,���`���,�_�,���`���,�_�,������,�_�,���`���,�_�,������,� G�tz Lohmann | D-Mannheim | Web-Developer & Sys-Admin --------------------------------------------------------- He's the fellow that people wonder what he does and why the company needs him, until he goes on vacation. �,���`���,�_�,���`���,�_�,������,�_�,���`���,�_�,������,� _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
