This is definitely a bug, i will take a look at it.

FYI, the master branch is slated to become cobbler 3.0, this means
functionality and API may (and shall) change or can be removed altogether
(eg. s390/itanium).

One other example is the remote kickstart URL feature; this has been
removed on purpose also as a result of multiple CVE reports.
Kickstarts *must* reside on the Cobbler server and also they *must* be in
the directory /var/lib/cobbler/kickstarts/

Cheers!




On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan <
n...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 28.08.2014 [16:40:54 -0300], Eduardo Bacchi Kienetz wrote:
> > Well, this reminds me that using a combo is a regression as we are
> > no longer able to provide a custom kickstart url (used to be a text
> > field).
>
> I didn't have my old installs handy (lots of dead servers lately!) so I
> wasn't able to check on this myself, but it did seem like this was new.
> Thanks for the confirmation. The code still supports (iirc) adding
> custom kickstarts into the list, but now there's not a web UI way of
> providing it.
>
> -Nish
>
> >
> > On 08/28/2014 04:15 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > >This commit (afaict, not bisected, as I'm trying to get my server up &
> > >running) broke the web UI. It removed the "<<inherit>>" entry from the
> > >dropdown for systems' kickstarts. The default became "" (added in a
> > >separate commit) -- but then provided no means to set the kickstart as
> > >inherited again.
> > >
> > >The simple change below
> > >
> > >--- a/web/cobbler_web/views.py
> > >+++ b/web/cobbler_web/views.py
> > >@@ -1108,6 +1108,7 @@ def generic_edit(request, what=None,
> obj_name=None, editmode="new"):
> > >      # allow for an empty value in the webui
> > >      kickstart_list = remote.get_kickstart_templates()
> > >      kickstart_list.append("")
> > >+    kickstart_list.append("<<inherit>>")
> > >      kickstart_list.sort()
> > >      # populate some select boxes
> > >
> > >got me working again, but seems like a workaround possibly for something
> > >not expexpected.
> > >
> > >Just an FYI, these "refactoring" changes seem like they are also
> > >changing functionality -- dunno if that's ideal, it would be nice if the
> > >commits were a bit more split up. But I appreciate all the improvements
> > >I'm seeing!
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cobbler-devel mailing list
> > cobbler-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobbler-devel mailing list
> cobbler-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler-devel
>



-- 
Grtz,
Jörgen Maas
_______________________________________________
cobbler-devel mailing list
cobbler-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler-devel

Reply via email to