Jasper Capel wrote: > Michael DeHaan wrote: > >> Right now the interface name could be arbitrary, so it seems it would >> only depend on the magic to set things up right in %post. Does anyone >> care to take a shot at cleaning up the "post-network-system-config" >> snippet on the Wiki now? We should make it account for mutliple >> interfaces first, add it to %post in the default templates, and then we >> can teach it about bonding once that is established. >> > > I spent some time on this yesterday, but unfortunately I won't be able > to test it this week, so there's probably some typo in it. > If someone wants to look at it, then great, else I'll try to find the > time next week. :) > Tested, removed a few bugs and this works for EL5 now. I don't know if we'd want to call this one by default, as there's still a default interface intf0 for systems. This would result in the first interface being called intf0 instead of eth0, which doesn't make much sense to me. I think we should change that behaviour first. :) And I'm not too happy with the name post_network_system_config, so I renamed it to post_install_network_config, any objections?
Once this is done, we can look into bonding and vlan support. VLANs would be fairly easy, so that's a nice next target. > See: > http://bender.newnewyork.nl/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cobbler/.git;a=commit;h=4746ca96f1950ed98a3068f57755df647ca1a4d7 http://bender.newnewyork.nl/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cobbler/.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/post-network > or: > git://bender.newnewyork.nl/cobbler (branch: post-network) > > Jasper _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
